In the foundations unit, we also covered Greek architecture an
d design which focused on the idea of real: ideal. I take this statement as portraying the world in a realistic way, but also somewhat "sugarcoating" it by making things look more excellent than they may have been. For example, the columns on the end of the Parthenon in Athens, Greece are smaller than the rest because of the angle at which you are looking at it creates an optical illusion and makes you eye think all of the columns are the exact same size. This creates an idea in my mind: making the imperfect look perfect, or the other way around the perfect look imperfect, which is what I think the Greeks may have settled their whole idea of architecture around. Greece was also a water-oriented culture. My first thought when I hear the word "Greece" is white buildings with blue roofs. I think their purpose in doing this was to contrast the blueness of the sea by painting the buildings white, but then bringing back the blue with the roof top color. What I gained from this unit was that the Greek's wanted to perceive themselves as more glorious and powerful than they maybe even were.

Another foundation for architecture would be the city of Rome. Rome created an extravagant pleasure within their modern city. The Romans were very intrigued by the Greek's, which is another reason why Greek architecture is a foundation for other country's inspirations for architecture. The Romans created a foundation for the rest of the world through their technological breakthroughs. The Romans created the aqueduct, villa, dome, road, arch, and mosaic. All of these things back up how the Romans use assimilation and adaption for their basis of design. Their way of designing is typically using a large scale that orders for space and diverse building types. Because of all of these methods they came up with, the Romans had the longest lasting empire in the world and because of their intuitiveness and productivity they were able to accomplish many aspects that changed architecture for the rest of the world. The foundations unit explained many standpoints of where certain ideas of architecture came from and how they affect the world we now know. Even though some buildings may be new now, almost all of the ideas may date back to the foundations of Egypt, Greece, and Rome.

This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI would first like to point out that your image for this assignment is missing. Your word count is on target, but I feel that more could have been done to show your understanding of the material. I enjoyed the tidbit about assimilation and adaptation when you talked about rome, but when you talk about Greece i was a bit confused. Blue Roofs? I understand where you were going with it, but I'm not quite sure it is entirely accurate. Greek builds have also not always been white. They were richly painted and decorated. be sure you understand the topic before you write about it. Also, be sure to proof read before you post to make sure everything makes sense.
ReplyDeleteAlthough you hit the word count, many of your expressed ideas were a bit limited in understanding/explanation. I came across some inaccurate information in your Point essay. I'd like to clarify that Greek buildings weren't necessarily white and Hatshepsut didn't design her temple (although she may have had some influence throughout the design process). Ah, and your image is missing.
ReplyDeleteI think that you could have done a better job conveying your understanding of the unit in your summary. I don't really get the feeling that everything is discussed in your summary that needed to be discussed. Also your image is missing, which is another key aspect to help show your understand of the reading. I think you could dig a lot deeper.
ReplyDeleteYour text could have been longer to give a smooth transition between thoughts. Your word count is sufficient but could have been expanded to incorporate transitions. There are several images you could have brought in here to drive home your point. You open with Queen Hatshepsut and my concern is that you may not have explored that as much as you could have... your entire essay could have revolved around her. She was not, however an architect... she was a queen who employed architects, specifically Ineni, who had worked for her father. She had several building projects but they were hers in name of power not profession.
ReplyDelete